If it were to be, how many other ideas would become criminal? I am all for letting fools speak freely to let them fully identify themselves. If people fallow fools then I might consider the need to save people from themselves. The fact the need arises to even discuss the issue shows we have had a major failure to communicate in the last few decades.
The fact that there is an issue shows that communication meets criteria of forbidding thought. When that happens, it suggests that evasion and mudslinging are at work by official disinformation agents. Considering the war of words minimizing civilian deaths in Iraq after the invasion, one might consider which other holocaust is also being denied regarding Germany and the end of open conflict. www.whale.to/b/mockingbird.html www.nazigassings.com/SafetyGuidelines.htm
ReplyDelete